[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgJ/XWVxxWDVBBVA@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 15:34:05 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH REPOST] irq_poll: Add local_bh_disable() in cpu_dead notifier
__raise_softirq_irqoff() adds a bit to the pending sofirq mask and this
is it. The softirq won't be handled in a deterministic way but randomly
when an interrupt fires and handles the softirq in its irq_exit() routine or
if something randomly checks and handles pending softirqs in the call
chain before the CPU goes idle.
Add a local_bh_disable/enable() around the IRQ-off section which will
handle pending softirqs.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
---
Repost of
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210930103754.2128949-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de
lib/irq_poll.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/lib/irq_poll.c
+++ b/lib/irq_poll.c
@@ -191,11 +191,13 @@ static int irq_poll_cpu_dead(unsigned in
* If a CPU goes away, splice its entries to the current CPU
* and trigger a run of the softirq
*/
+ local_bh_disable();
local_irq_disable();
list_splice_init(&per_cpu(blk_cpu_iopoll, cpu),
this_cpu_ptr(&blk_cpu_iopoll));
__raise_softirq_irqoff(IRQ_POLL_SOFTIRQ);
local_irq_enable();
+ local_bh_enable();
return 0;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists