[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220208145928.12468-5-laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2022 16:59:26 +0200
From: laurentiu.tudor@....com
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: ioana.ciornei@....com, diana.craciun@....nxp.com,
jon@...id-run.com, Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] bus: fsl-mc: check for null irq array
From: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
In VFIO case, the irq array in the fsl_mc device is not initialized,
so given that in upcoming patches this code will also get called by
VFIO add a check for null in the irq teardown function.
Signed-off-by: Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@....com>
---
drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c | 7 ++++++-
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c
index 36681cf7c42e..8482c4fca835 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/fsl-mc/dprc-driver.c
@@ -767,7 +767,12 @@ static int dprc_probe(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev)
*/
static void dprc_teardown_irq(struct fsl_mc_device *mc_dev)
{
- struct fsl_mc_device_irq *irq = mc_dev->irqs[0];
+ struct fsl_mc_device_irq *irq;
+
+ if (!mc_dev->irqs)
+ return;
+
+ irq = mc_dev->irqs[0];
(void)disable_dprc_irq(mc_dev);
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists