[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2202091639491.32090@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 16:42:55 +0100 (CET)
From: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Allocate module text and data separately
On Thu, 27 Jan 2022, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> This series allow architectures to request having modules data in
> vmalloc area instead of module area.
>
> This is required on powerpc book3s/32 in order to set data non
> executable, because it is not possible to set executability on page
> basis, this is done per 256 Mbytes segments. The module area has exec
> right, vmalloc area has noexec. Without this change module data
> remains executable regardless of CONFIG_STRICT_MODULES_RWX.
>
> This can also be useful on other powerpc/32 in order to maximize the
> chance of code being close enough to kernel core to avoid branch
> trampolines.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Dropped first two patches which are not necessary. They may be added back later as a follow-up series.
> - Fixed the printks in GDB
>
> Christophe Leroy (5):
> modules: Always have struct mod_tree_root
> modules: Prepare for handling several RB trees
> modules: Introduce data_layout
> modules: Add CONFIG_ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC
> powerpc: Select ARCH_WANTS_MODULES_DATA_IN_VMALLOC on book3s/32 and
> 8xx
>
> arch/Kconfig | 6 ++
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 1 +
> include/linux/module.h | 8 ++
> kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c | 10 +-
> kernel/module.c | 193 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 5 files changed, 156 insertions(+), 62 deletions(-)
Looks good to me apart from the typo I mentioned at v1. I will review
again once it is rebased on Aaron's patch set.
Regards,
Miroslav
Powered by blists - more mailing lists