[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgP0JOilWpKU4704@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 17:04:36 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Cc: lhjeff911@...il.com, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: initialize ret variable
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:44:21AM -0800, Tom Rix wrote:
> On 2/9/22 8:33 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:30:29AM -0800, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> > > Clang build fails with
> > > spi-sunplus-sp7021.c:405:2: error: variable 'ret' is used
> > > uninitialized whenever switch default is taken
> > > default:
> > > ^~~~~~~
> > > Restore initializing ret.
> > Are you sure this is a good fix and that the compiler hasn't instead
> > identifed that we should be returning an error in the default case?
> If setting mode to idle is not really a valid state, then default should
> return an error.
Yes, that's what I'm asking.
> The old behavior returned 0 and I am treating this as a regression.
The goal here isn't just to shut up warnings, it's to fix any problems
that they identify. Unconditionally initialising return values is a
common way of fixing warnings while leaving real problems in place.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists