[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa0833ac-154e-9a66-c3f5-7c3b98f15f19@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 12:26:40 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, joseph.salisbury@...onical.com,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/ftrace: Do not trace do_softirq because of
PREEMPT_RT
On 2/9/22 9:24 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The PREEMPT_RT patchset does not use soft IRQs thus trying to filter for
> do_softirq fails for such kernel:
>
> echo do_softirq
> ftracetest: 81: echo: echo: I/O error
>
> Choose some other externally visible function for the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>
> ---
>
> I understand that the failure does not exist on mainline kernel (only
> with PREEMPT_RT patchset) but the change does not harm it.
>
> If it is not suitable alone, please consider it for RT patchset.
> ---
> .../selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_set_ftrace_file.tc | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_set_ftrace_file.tc b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_set_ftrace_file.tc
> index e96e279e0533..1d0c7601865f 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_set_ftrace_file.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_set_ftrace_file.tc
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ fail() { # mesg
>
> FILTER=set_ftrace_filter
> FUNC1="schedule"
> -FUNC2="do_softirq"
> +FUNC2="_printk"
>
> ALL_FUNCS="#### all functions enabled ####"
>
>
Change looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
Powered by blists - more mailing lists