linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 1/9] random: use RDSEED instead of RDRAND in entropy extraction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220209011919.493762-2-Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Wed,  9 Feb 2022 02:19:11 +0100
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
To:     linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     tytso@....edu, linux@...inikbrodowski.net, ebiggers@...nel.org,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/9] random: use RDSEED instead of RDRAND in entropy extraction

When /dev/random was directly connected with entropy extraction, without
any expansion stage, extract_buf() was called for every 10 bytes of data
read from /dev/random. For that reason, RDRAND was used rather than
RDSEED. At the same time, crng_reseed() was still only called every 5
minutes, so there RDSEED made sense.

Those olden days were also a time when the entropy collector did not use
a cryptographic hash function, which meant most bets were off in terms
of real preimage resistance. For that reason too it didn't matter
_that_ much whether RDSEED was mixed in before or after entropy
extraction; both choices were sort of bad.

But now we have a cryptographic hash function at work, and with that we
get real preimage resistance. We also now only call extract_entropy()
every 5 minutes, rather than every 10 bytes. This allows us to do two
important things.

First, we can switch to using RDSEED in extract_entropy(), as Dominik
suggested. Second, we can ensure that RDSEED input always goes into the
cryptographic hash function with other things before being used
directly. This eliminates a category of attacks in which the CPU knows
the current state of the crng and knows that we're going to xor RDSEED
into it, and so it computes a malicious RDSEED. By going through our
hash function, it would require the CPU to compute a preimage on the
fly, which isn't going to happen.

Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@...gle.com>
Suggested-by: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
---
 drivers/char/random.c | 22 +++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/char/random.c b/drivers/char/random.c
index 22d12213d548..ce3c019e5f5f 100644
--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -722,13 +722,8 @@ static void crng_reseed(struct crng_state *crng)
 					CHACHA_KEY_SIZE);
 	}
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&crng->lock, flags);
-	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
-		unsigned long rv;
-		if (!arch_get_random_seed_long(&rv) &&
-		    !arch_get_random_long(&rv))
-			rv = random_get_entropy();
-		crng->state[i + 4] ^= buf.key[i] ^ rv;
-	}
+	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++)
+		crng->state[i + 4] ^= buf.key[i];
 	memzero_explicit(&buf, sizeof(buf));
 	WRITE_ONCE(crng->init_time, jiffies);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&crng->lock, flags);
@@ -1064,16 +1059,17 @@ static void extract_entropy(void *buf, size_t nbytes)
 	unsigned long flags;
 	u8 seed[BLAKE2S_HASH_SIZE], next_key[BLAKE2S_HASH_SIZE];
 	struct {
-		unsigned long rdrand[32 / sizeof(long)];
+		unsigned long rdseed[32 / sizeof(long)];
 		size_t counter;
 	} block;
 	size_t i;

 	trace_extract_entropy(nbytes, input_pool.entropy_count);

-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(block.rdrand); ++i) {
-		if (!arch_get_random_long(&block.rdrand[i]))
-			block.rdrand[i] = random_get_entropy();
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(block.rdseed); ++i) {
+		if (!arch_get_random_seed_long(&block.rdseed[i]) &&
+		    !arch_get_random_long(&block.rdseed[i]))
+			block.rdseed[i] = random_get_entropy();
 	}

 	spin_lock_irqsave(&input_pool.lock, flags);
@@ -1081,7 +1077,7 @@ static void extract_entropy(void *buf, size_t nbytes)
 	/* seed = HASHPRF(last_key, entropy_input) */
 	blake2s_final(&input_pool.hash, seed);

-	/* next_key = HASHPRF(seed, RDRAND || 0) */
+	/* next_key = HASHPRF(seed, RDSEED || 0) */
 	block.counter = 0;
 	blake2s(next_key, (u8 *)&block, seed, sizeof(next_key), sizeof(block), sizeof(seed));
 	blake2s_init_key(&input_pool.hash, BLAKE2S_HASH_SIZE, next_key, sizeof(next_key));
@@ -1091,7 +1087,7 @@ static void extract_entropy(void *buf, size_t nbytes)

 	while (nbytes) {
 		i = min_t(size_t, nbytes, BLAKE2S_HASH_SIZE);
-		/* output = HASHPRF(seed, RDRAND || ++counter) */
+		/* output = HASHPRF(seed, RDSEED || ++counter) */
 		++block.counter;
 		blake2s(buf, (u8 *)&block, seed, i, sizeof(block), sizeof(seed));
 		nbytes -= i;
-- 
2.35.0