[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220209093828.GL23216@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 10:38:28 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@...ux.intel.com>,
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Gautham Shenoy <gautham.shenoy@....com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Adjust NUMA imbalance for multiple LLCs
On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 09:43:32AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> Changelog sinve v5
> o Fix off-by-one error
>
> Changelog since V4
> o Scale imbalance based on the top domain that prefers siblings
> o Keep allowed imbalance as 2 up to the point where LLCs can be overloaded
>
> Changelog since V3
> o Calculate imb_numa_nr for multiple SD_NUMA domains
> o Restore behaviour where communicating pairs remain on the same node
>
> Commit 7d2b5dd0bcc4 ("sched/numa: Allow a floating imbalance between NUMA
> nodes") allowed an imbalance between NUMA nodes such that communicating
> tasks would not be pulled apart by the load balancer. This works fine when
> there is a 1:1 relationship between LLC and node but can be suboptimal
> for multiple LLCs if independent tasks prematurely use CPUs sharing cache.
>
> The series addresses two problems -- inconsistent logic when allowing a
> NUMA imbalance and sub-optimal performance when there are many LLCs per
> NUMA node.
>
> include/linux/sched/topology.h | 1 +
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 30 ++++++++++---------
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists