linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add DT for lan966x SoC and 2-port board pcb8291

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ee9826d1-216e-45b0-e48b-700ec41b3683@microchip.com>
Date:   Wed, 9 Feb 2022 10:56:22 +0100
From:   Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:     Kavyasree Kotagiri <kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, SoC Team <soc@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Microchip Linux Driver Support <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: add DT for lan966x SoC and 2-port board
 pcb8291

On 08/02/2022 at 17:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 9:33 AM Nicolas Ferre
> <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>  wrote:
>> On 13/01/2022 at 09:00, Kavyasree Kotagiri wrote:
>>> This patch adds basic DT for Microchip lan966x SoC and associated board
>>> pcb8291(2-port EVB). Adds peripherals required to allow booting: IRQs,
>>> clocks, timers, memory, flexcoms, GPIOs. Also adds other peripherals like
>>> crypto(AES,SHA), DMA and watchdog.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kavyasree Kotagiri<kavyasree.kotagiri@...rochip.com>
>> Looks good to me:
>> Reviewed-by: Nicolas Ferre<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>
> I'm not quite sure what to do with this, as this was sentto:soc@...nel.org,
> which is normally for patches that are already reviewed and should just
> get applied.
> 
> I can apply this, but I would normally expect board files to get picked up
> in the at91 tree first. I'll drop this version from patchwork for now, as I
> also have a couple of comments:

I have the intention to take this patch when it's ready in the at91 tree.

Thanks for your feedback Arnd. Best regards,
   Nicolas

-- 
Nicolas Ferre