linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] microblaze: remove CONFIG_SET

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgPHJy9NDVFr5s6w@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 9 Feb 2022 05:52:39 -0800
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] microblaze: remove CONFIG_SET_FS

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 02:50:32PM +0100, Michal Simek wrote:
> I can't see any issue with the patch when I run it on real HW.
> Tested-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
> 
> Christoph: Is there any recommended test suite which I should run?

No.  For architectures that already didn't use set_fs internally
there is nothing specific to test.  Running some perf or backtrace
tests might be useful to check if the non-faulting kernel helpers
work properly.