[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220209152730.13f52fa2@endymion.delvare>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:27:30 +0100
From: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To: Xavier Roche <xavier.roche@...olia.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1] tmpfs: support for file creation time
On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 15:12:33 +0100, Xavier Roche wrote:
> Various filesystems (including ext4) now support file creation time.
> This patch tentatively adds such support for tmpfs-based filesystems.
>
> The reason is that creation time has been supported on an increasing number
> of filesystems (this information can be retrieved through the statx()
> userland function), and its support for tmpfs would add consistency.
> Example of use includes checking the creation time of an ephemeral status file
> being updated (such as a "work in progress" placeholder), to get two time
> points (starting point and last update).
>
> Note that I am nothing but a new contributor, and while this patch has
> been tested (and userland results checked), the logic might be broken.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xavier Roche <xavier.roche@...olia.com>
> ---
> include/linux/shmem_fs.h | 1 +
> mm/shmem.c | 11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+)
> (...)
Tested-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
Code looks reasonable, but take my review with a grain of salt as this
isn't my area.
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
--
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Powered by blists - more mailing lists