[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <600f0f72-4af8-1c43-33a5-a0b5ef97c3c7@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 16:17:01 +0100
From: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Noralf Trønnes <noralf@...nnes.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] drm: Add driver for Solomon SSD130X OLED displays
On 2/9/22 16:03, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 03:50:13PM +0100, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
[snip]
>
>> But I understand why the Device Tree binding and fbdev driver used VBAT
>> since that's what the documentation mentions.
>
> What is "the documentation" in this context and how is that distinct
> from the datasheet for the display controller? In general the consumer
> driver should be using the name from the datasheet and the regulator
> itself should get a regulator-name reflecting the name in the schematic.
>
For "documentation" I meant the datasheet that mentions VBAT but I got
what you mean and will also propose a change to the binding to rename
the property to vcc-supply instead to match the pin name in the device.
>>> It is depressingly common to see broken code here, unfortunately
>>> graphics drivers seem like one of the most common offendors.
>
>> I'll include a patch for the existing DT binding and mark the vbat-supply
>> property as required. Probably we won't be able to change the fbdev driver
>> without causing regressions, and I'm not interested in that driver anyways.
>
> There should be little danger of causing regressions given that a dummy
> regualtor will be provided when one is missing.
Right, I forgot that a dummy regulator is provided in that case. Perfect.
Best regards,
--
Javier Martinez Canillas
Linux Engineering
Red Hat
Powered by blists - more mailing lists