[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <85bbc0e8-7709-71bc-41ba-9c2f0b2e717d@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:27:47 -0800
From: Victor Erminpour <victor.erminpour@...cle.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com
Cc: guohanjun@...wei.com, sudeep.holla@....com, rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/IORT: Fix GCC 12 warning
On 2/10/22 10:06 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2022-02-10 00:32, Victor Erminpour wrote:
>> When building with automatic stack variable initialization, GCC 12
>> complains about variables defined outside of switch case statements.
>> Move the variable into the case that uses it, which silences the
>> warning:
>>
>> ./drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:1670:59: error: statement will never be
>> executed [-Werror=switch-unreachable]
>> 1670 | struct acpi_iort_named_component
>> *ncomp;
>> | ^~~~~
>
> Notwithstanding the fact that that warning is nonsensical, this patch
> changes valid C code into invalid C code that doesn't even compile:
>
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c: In function
> ‘acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address’:
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:1669:4: error: a label can only be part of a
> statement and a declaration is not a statement
> 1669 | struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
> | ^~~~~~
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c:1676:4: error: a label can only be part of a
> statement and a declaration is not a statement
> 1676 | struct acpi_iort_root_complex *rc;
> | ^~~~~~
>
> Robin.
>
Hi Robin,
Thank you for your constructive criticism.
Could the solution be enclosing the case statement in curly braces?
I know this isn't a big issue for you, but this is a legitimate error
for people
building the kernel with GCC 12 and CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL_ZERO enabled.
Regards,
--Victor
>> Signed-off-by: Victor Erminpour <victor.erminpour@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 8 +++-----
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> index 3b23fb775ac4..5c5d2e56d756 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
>> @@ -1645,7 +1645,7 @@ void __init acpi_iort_init(void)
>> */
>> phys_addr_t __init acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void)
>> {
>> - phys_addr_t limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
>> + phys_addr_t local_limit, limit = PHYS_ADDR_MAX;
>> struct acpi_iort_node *node, *end;
>> struct acpi_table_iort *iort;
>> acpi_status status;
>> @@ -1667,17 +1667,15 @@ phys_addr_t __init
>> acpi_iort_dma_get_max_cpu_address(void)
>> break;
>> switch (node->type) {
>> - struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
>> - struct acpi_iort_root_complex *rc;
>> - phys_addr_t local_limit;
>> -
>> case ACPI_IORT_NODE_NAMED_COMPONENT:
>> + struct acpi_iort_named_component *ncomp;
>> ncomp = (struct acpi_iort_named_component
>> *)node->node_data;
>> local_limit = DMA_BIT_MASK(ncomp->memory_address_limit);
>> limit = min_not_zero(limit, local_limit);
>> break;
>> case ACPI_IORT_NODE_PCI_ROOT_COMPLEX:
>> + struct acpi_iort_root_complex *rc;
>> if (node->revision < 1)
>> break;
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
>> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!ZcNRWTaQIb1uVqcZAusSzXd2kBnWuqAuICpxkOm6bOWBouQoFygbcIMJVUNp34LqhNrc$
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists