lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:33:41 +0100 From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org, Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>, dchickles@...vell.com, sburla@...vell.com, fmanlunas@...vell.com, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: cavium: use div64_u64() instead of do_div() Le 10/02/2022 à 03:01, Jakub Kicinski a écrit : > On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 21:01:35 +0100 Christophe JAILLET wrote: >> Le 09/02/2022 à 14:30, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org a écrit : >>> Here is the summary with links: >>> - net: ethernet: cavium: use div64_u64() instead of do_div() >>> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/038fcdaf0470 >>> >>> You are awesome, thank you! >> >> Hi, >> >> I think that this patch should be reverted because do_div() and >> div64_u64() don't have the same calling convention. >> >> See [1] >> >> [1]: >> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20211117112559.jix3hmx7uwqmuryg@pengutronix.de/ > > Would you mind sending a revert? > I don't work on net-next, only linux-next. I can send a revert once it reaches linux-next but I would be better if it is fixed before that. CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists