[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7e2e7db-fd32-d30c-32f4-8850a00f35d9@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 19:33:41 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org, Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>,
dchickles@...vell.com, sburla@...vell.com, fmanlunas@...vell.com,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: ethernet: cavium: use div64_u64() instead of
do_div()
Le 10/02/2022 à 03:01, Jakub Kicinski a écrit :
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 21:01:35 +0100 Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> Le 09/02/2022 à 14:30, patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org a écrit :
>>> Here is the summary with links:
>>> - net: ethernet: cavium: use div64_u64() instead of do_div()
>>> https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/038fcdaf0470
>>>
>>> You are awesome, thank you!
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think that this patch should be reverted because do_div() and
>> div64_u64() don't have the same calling convention.
>>
>> See [1]
>>
>> [1]:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20211117112559.jix3hmx7uwqmuryg@pengutronix.de/
>
> Would you mind sending a revert?
>
I don't work on net-next, only linux-next.
I can send a revert once it reaches linux-next but I would be better if
it is fixed before that.
CJ
Powered by blists - more mailing lists