[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgTGihSrtlRR3DPC@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:02:18 +0100
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@...o.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the qcom tree
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 02:11:00PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq6018.dtsi
>
> between commit:
>
> d1c10ab1494f ("arm64: dts: qcom: ipq6018: fix usb reference period")
>
> from the qcom tree and commit:
>
> 5726079cd486 ("arm64: dts: ipq6018: Use reference clock to set dwc3 period")
>
> from the usb tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I just use the latter) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
That is fine, thanks.
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists