[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOtMz3OJNopHKgKDvGNfVWwvvo57=LyiRcnT+x6TxwLb+hgkyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:18:08 +0100
From: Jan Dąbroś <jsd@...ihalf.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Raul E Rangel <rrangel@...omium.org>,
Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>,
Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>, upstream@...ihalf.com,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
"Deucher, Alexander" <alexander.deucher@....com>,
"Easow, Nimesh" <Nimesh.Easow@....com>,
"Limonciello, Mario" <mario.limonciello@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] i2c: designware: Add AMD PSP I2C bus support
śr., 9 lut 2022 o 16:28 Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2022 at 03:12:18PM +0100, Jan Dabros wrote:
>
> ...
>
> I have noticed code duplication.
>
> > + status = psp_send_i2c_req(PSP_I2C_REQ_ACQUIRE);
> > + if (status) {
> > + if (status == -ETIMEDOUT)
> > + dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "Timed out waiting for PSP to release I2C bus\n");
> > + else
> > + dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "PSP communication error\n");
> > +
> > + dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "Assume i2c bus is for exclusive host usage\n");
> > + psp_i2c_mbox_fail = true;
> > + goto cleanup;
> > + }
>
> > + /* Send a release command to PSP */
> > + status = psp_send_i2c_req(PSP_I2C_REQ_RELEASE);
> > + if (status) {
> > + if (status == -ETIMEDOUT)
> > + dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "Timed out waiting for PSP to acquire I2C bus\n");
> > + else
> > + dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "PSP communication error\n");
> > +
> > + dev_err(psp_i2c_dev, "Assume i2c bus is for exclusive host usage\n");
> > + psp_i2c_mbox_fail = true;
> > + goto cleanup;
> > + }
>
> If you are going to update the series, consider to introduce a common helper.
> Otherwise, consider a follow up.
Thanks for your comment. Since Jarkko is running some long-lasting
tests with v4 patchset, I would like to keep this as is for now (and
make a follow up commit). If there will be some additional comments
for v4 from him and will spin v5 - I will introduce a common helper
function then.
Best Regards,
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists