[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1644481929-14955-1-git-send-email-wangqing@vivo.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 00:32:09 -0800
From: Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
Subject: [PATCH] media: stv0299: use time_after_eq() instead of jiffies judgment
From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
It is better to use time_xxx() directly instead of jiffies judgment
for understanding.
Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
---
drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0299.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0299.c b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0299.c
index 421395e..867ae04
--- a/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0299.c
+++ b/drivers/media/dvb-frontends/stv0299.c
@@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static int stv0299_wait_diseqc_fifo (struct stv0299_state* state, int timeout)
dprintk ("%s\n", __func__);
while (stv0299_readreg(state, 0x0a) & 1) {
- if (jiffies - start > timeout) {
+ if (time_after(jiffies, start + timeout)) {
dprintk ("%s: timeout!!\n", __func__);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
@@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int stv0299_wait_diseqc_idle (struct stv0299_state* state, int timeout)
dprintk ("%s\n", __func__);
while ((stv0299_readreg(state, 0x0a) & 3) != 2 ) {
- if (jiffies - start > timeout) {
+ if (time_after(jiffies, start + timeout)) {
dprintk ("%s: timeout!!\n", __func__);
return -ETIMEDOUT;
}
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists