linux-kernel - Re: [syzbot] WARNING: kmalloc bug in xdp_umem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:35:14 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
        syzbot <syzbot+11421fbbff99b989670e@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc:     akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andrii@...nel.org, ast@...nel.org,
        bjorn.topel@...il.com, bjorn.topel@...el.com, bjorn@...nel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, fgheet255t@...il.com,
        hawk@...nel.org, john.fastabend@...il.com,
        jonathan.lemon@...il.com, kafai@...com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        kuba@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        magnus.karlsson@...el.com, mudongliangabcd@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, songliubraving@...com,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        yhs@...com
Subject: Re: [syzbot] WARNING: kmalloc bug in xdp_umem_create (2)

On 2/10/22 9:11 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 10:08:07PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
>> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
>>
>> commit 7661809d493b426e979f39ab512e3adf41fbcc69
>> Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
>> Date:   Wed Jul 14 16:45:49 2021 +0000
>>
>>      mm: don't allow oversized kvmalloc() calls
>>
>> bisection log:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=13bc74c2700000
>> start commit:   f4bc5bbb5fef Merge tag 'nfsd-5.17-2' of git://git.kernel.o..
>> git tree:       upstream
>> final oops:     https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=107c74c2700000
>> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=17bc74c2700000
>> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=5707221760c00a20
>> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=11421fbbff99b989670e
>> syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=12e514a4700000
>> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=15fcdf8a700000
>>
>> Reported-by: syzbot+11421fbbff99b989670e@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>> Fixes: 7661809d493b ("mm: don't allow oversized kvmalloc() calls")
>>
>> For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection
> 
> Interesting, so in fact syzkaller has shown that the aforementioned
> patch does its job well and has spotted a call path by which a single
> userland setsockopt() can request more than 2 GB allocation in the
> kernel. Most likely that's in fact what needs to be addressed.
> 
> FWIW the call trace at the URL above is:
> 
> Call Trace:
>   kvmalloc include/linux/mm.h:806 [inline]
>   kvmalloc_array include/linux/mm.h:824 [inline]
>   kvcalloc include/linux/mm.h:829 [inline]
>   xdp_umem_pin_pages net/xdp/xdp_umem.c:102 [inline]
>   xdp_umem_reg net/xdp/xdp_umem.c:219 [inline]
>   xdp_umem_create+0x6a5/0xf00 net/xdp/xdp_umem.c:252
>   xsk_setsockopt+0x604/0x790 net/xdp/xsk.c:1068
>   __sys_setsockopt+0x1fd/0x4e0 net/socket.c:2176
>   __do_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2187 [inline]
>   __se_sys_setsockopt net/socket.c:2184 [inline]
>   __x64_sys_setsockopt+0xb5/0x150 net/socket.c:2184
>   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
>   do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
>   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
> 
> and the meaningful part of the repro is:
> 
>    syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x1ffff000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
>    syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x20000000ul, 0x1000000ul, 7ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
>    syscall(__NR_mmap, 0x21000000ul, 0x1000ul, 0ul, 0x32ul, -1, 0ul);
>    intptr_t res = 0;
>    res = syscall(__NR_socket, 0x2cul, 3ul, 0);
>    if (res != -1)
>      r[0] = res;
>    *(uint64_t*)0x20000080 = 0;
>    *(uint64_t*)0x20000088 = 0xfff02000000;
>    *(uint32_t*)0x20000090 = 0x800;
>    *(uint32_t*)0x20000094 = 0;
>    *(uint32_t*)0x20000098 = 0;
>    syscall(__NR_setsockopt, r[0], 0x11b, 4, 0x20000080ul, 0x20ul);

Bjorn had a comment back then when the issue was first raised here:

   https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/3f854ca9-f5d6-4065-c7b1-5e5b25ea742f@iogearbox.net/

There was earlier discussion from Andrew to potentially retire the warning:

   https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211201202905.b9892171e3f5b9a60f9da251@linux-foundation.org/

Bjorn / Magnus / Andrew, anyone planning to follow-up on this issue?

Thanks,
Daniel