[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220210095051.b7rgpy6muvqjnih2@skbuf>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 09:50:52 +0000
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 net-next 1/5] net: mscc: ocelot: fix mutex lock error
during ethtool stats read
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:13:41PM -0800, Colin Foster wrote:
> An ongoing workqueue populates the stats buffer. At the same time, a user
> might query the statistics. While writing to the buffer is mutex-locked,
> reading from the buffer wasn't. This could lead to buggy reads by ethtool.
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Foster <colin.foster@...advantage.com>
> Fixes: a556c76adc052 ("net: mscc: Add initial Ocelot switch support")
> Reported-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
I reported this using vladimir.oltean@....com btw.
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
If you hurry and resend this against the "net" tree, you might catch
this week's pull request, since the last one was on Feb 3->4:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/20220204000428.2889873-1-kuba@kernel.org/
Then "net" will be merged into "net-next" probably the next day or so,
and you can resend patches 2-5 towards "net-next".
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c | 11 +++++++----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> index 455293aa6343..6933dff1dd37 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mscc/ocelot.c
> @@ -1737,12 +1737,11 @@ void ocelot_get_strings(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, u32 sset, u8 *data)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ocelot_get_strings);
>
> +/* Caller must hold &ocelot->stats_lock */
> static void ocelot_update_stats(struct ocelot *ocelot)
> {
> int i, j;
>
> - mutex_lock(&ocelot->stats_lock);
> -
> for (i = 0; i < ocelot->num_phys_ports; i++) {
> /* Configure the port to read the stats from */
> ocelot_write(ocelot, SYS_STAT_CFG_STAT_VIEW(i), SYS_STAT_CFG);
> @@ -1761,8 +1760,6 @@ static void ocelot_update_stats(struct ocelot *ocelot)
> ~(u64)U32_MAX) + val;
> }
> }
> -
> - mutex_unlock(&ocelot->stats_lock);
> }
>
> static void ocelot_check_stats_work(struct work_struct *work)
> @@ -1771,7 +1768,9 @@ static void ocelot_check_stats_work(struct work_struct *work)
> struct ocelot *ocelot = container_of(del_work, struct ocelot,
> stats_work);
>
> + mutex_lock(&ocelot->stats_lock);
> ocelot_update_stats(ocelot);
> + mutex_unlock(&ocelot->stats_lock);
>
> queue_delayed_work(ocelot->stats_queue, &ocelot->stats_work,
> OCELOT_STATS_CHECK_DELAY);
> @@ -1781,12 +1780,16 @@ void ocelot_get_ethtool_stats(struct ocelot *ocelot, int port, u64 *data)
> {
> int i;
>
> + mutex_lock(&ocelot->stats_lock);
> +
> /* check and update now */
> ocelot_update_stats(ocelot);
>
> /* Copy all counters */
> for (i = 0; i < ocelot->num_stats; i++)
> *data++ = ocelot->stats[port * ocelot->num_stats + i];
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&ocelot->stats_lock);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(ocelot_get_ethtool_stats);
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists