[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1e8c38eb-d66a-60e7-9432-eb70e7ec1dd4@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:52:03 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
dmatlack@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/23] KVM: MMU: remove kvm_mmu_calc_root_page_role
On 2/10/22 01:47, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> The nested mess is likely easily solved, I don't see any obvious issue with swapping
> the order. But I still don't love the subtlety. I do like shaving cycles, just
> not the subtlety...
Not so easily, but it's doable and it's essentially what I did in the
other series (the one that reworks the root cache).
Quick spoiler: there's a complicated dependency between the _old_ values
in kvm_mmu and the root cache, so that the root cache code currently
needs both the old MMU state (especially shadow_root_level/root_level)
and the new role.
kvm_mmu_reset_context does the expensive kvm_mmu_unload to cop out of
having to know in advance the new role; the crux of the other series is
to remove that need, so that kvm_mmu_reset_context does not have to cop
out anymore.
> If we do rework things to have kvm_mmu_new_pgd() pull the role from the mmu, then
> we should first add a long overdue audit/warn that KVM never runs with a mmu_role
> that isn't consistent with respect to its root SP's role.
There's a much cheaper check that can be done to enforce the invariant
that kvm_mmu_new_pgd must follow kvm_init_mmu: kvm_init_mmu sets a
not_ready flag, kvm_mmu_new_pgd clears it, and kvm_mmu_reload screams if
it sees not_ready == 1.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists