linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/23] KVM: MMU: MMU role refactoring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e02f05cb-d4b7-1fe5-0d1e-d9aec06a1842@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 10:54:07 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        dmatlack@...gle.com, vkuznets@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] KVM: MMU: MMU role refactoring

On 2/9/22 23:31, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Heresy!  Everyone knows the one true way is "KVM: x86/mmu:"
> 
>    $ glo | grep "KVM: MMU:" | wc -l
>    740
>    $ glo | grep "KVM: x86/mmu:" | wc -l
>    403
> 
> Dammit, I'm the heathen...
> 
> I do think we should use x86/mmu though.  VMX and SVM (and nVMX and nSVM) are ok
> because they're unlikely to collide with other architectures, but every arch has
> an MMU...
> 

Sure, I can adjust my habits.

Paolo