linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8259_aspeed_vuart: replace snprintf with sysfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:13:28 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     davidcomponentone@...il.com
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>,
        Zev Weiss <zev@...ilderbeest.net>,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Yang Guang <yang.guang5@....com.cn>,
        "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/ASPEED MACHINE SUPPORT" 
        <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] serial: 8259_aspeed_vuart: replace snprintf with sysfs_emit

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 12:54 PM <davidcomponentone@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yang Guang <yang.guang5@....com.cn>
>
> coccinelle report:
> ./drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c:85:8-16:
> WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf
> ./drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c:174:8-16:
> WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf
> ./drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_aspeed_vuart.c:127:8-16:
> WARNING: use scnprintf or sprintf
>
> Use sysfs_emit instead of scnprintf or sprintf makes more sense.

sysfs_emit()
scnprintf()
sprintf()

...

> CC: David Yang <davidcomponentone@...il.com>

> - Use the CC for patch sender

This is incorrect. The submitter must have (the last) SoB tag.
Question was about authorship just to be clear.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko