lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgT0oU/5SMViNRu7@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 11:18:57 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Yun Zhou <yun.zhou@...driver.com>
Cc:     linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ying.xue@...driver.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: disable chipselect after complete transfer

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 10:03:16AM +0800, Yun Zhou wrote:

> if the last xfer->cs_change is true, keep_cs will be true, and it will not
> call spi_set_cs() to set CS to false. Do you mean to keep CS enabled in this
> case?

Yes, that's exactly what is supposed to happen in that case.

> I do not think it will break cs_change support. In my understanding,
> cs_change indicates whether or not change CS after an xfer completed. But at
> present if the last xfer->cs_change is true, we will not change CS to
> disabled state. Is this the result we want? I'm confused.

Yes, it behaves differently on the last transfer.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ