linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: s390: Add optional storage key checking to MEMOP IOCTL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:59:03 +0100
From:   Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: s390: Add optional storage key checking to
 MEMOP IOCTL

On 2/9/22 18:04, Janis Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> User space needs a mechanism to perform key checked accesses when
> emulating instructions.
> 
> The key can be passed as an additional argument.
> Having an additional argument is flexible, as user space can
> pass the guest PSW's key, in order to make an access the same way the
> CPU would, or pass another key if necessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
> Acked-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  include/uapi/linux/kvm.h |  6 +++++-
>  2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index cf347e1a4f17..85763ec7bc60 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
>  #include <linux/string.h>
>  #include <linux/pgtable.h>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>  #include <asm/lowcore.h>
> @@ -2359,6 +2360,11 @@ static int kvm_s390_handle_pv(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_pv_cmd *cmd)
>  	return r;
>  }
>  
> +static bool access_key_invalid(u8 access_key)
> +{
> +	return access_key > 0xf;
> +}
> +
>  long kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp,
>  		       unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
>  {
> @@ -4690,17 +4696,19 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_mem_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	void *tmpbuf = NULL;
>  	int r = 0;
>  	const u64 supported_flags = KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_INJECT_EXCEPTION
> -				    | KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY;
> +				    | KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY
> +				    | KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION;
>  
>  	if (mop->flags & ~supported_flags || mop->ar >= NUM_ACRS || !mop->size)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	if (mop->size > MEM_OP_MAX_SIZE)
>  		return -E2BIG;
> -
>  	if (kvm_s390_pv_cpu_is_protected(vcpu))
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -
> +	if (mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_SKEY_PROTECTION) {
> +		if (access_key_invalid(mop->key))
> +			return -EINVAL;

I got this wrong unfortunately, we need to explicitly default to key 0, i.e.
+       } else {
+               mop->key = 0;
Same for the vm memop.
Didn't have a test case for this, yet.
> +	}>  	if (!(mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY)) {
>  		tmpbuf = vmalloc(mop->size);
>  		if (!tmpbuf)
> @@ -4710,11 +4718,12 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_mem_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	switch (mop->op) {
>  	case KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ:
>  		if (mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY) {
> -			r = check_gva_range(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar,
> -					    mop->size, GACC_FETCH, 0);
> +			r = check_gva_range(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, mop->size,
> +					    GACC_FETCH, mop->key);
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		r = read_guest(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, tmpbuf, mop->size);
> +		r = read_guest_with_key(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, tmpbuf,
> +					mop->size, mop->key);
>  		if (r == 0) {
>  			if (copy_to_user(uaddr, tmpbuf, mop->size))
>  				r = -EFAULT;
> @@ -4722,15 +4731,16 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_mem_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  		break;
>  	case KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE:
>  		if (mop->flags & KVM_S390_MEMOP_F_CHECK_ONLY) {
> -			r = check_gva_range(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar,
> -					    mop->size, GACC_STORE, 0);
> +			r = check_gva_range(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, mop->size,
> +					    GACC_STORE, mop->key);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  		if (copy_from_user(tmpbuf, uaddr, mop->size)) {
>  			r = -EFAULT;
>  			break;
>  		}
> -		r = write_guest(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, tmpbuf, mop->size);
> +		r = write_guest_with_key(vcpu, mop->gaddr, mop->ar, tmpbuf,
> +					 mop->size, mop->key);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  

[...]