[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C70293C2-8CE8-42CE-911A-E0CC3DFB82FC@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 05:46:52 +0400
From: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@...il.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: meson: remove CPU opps below 1GHz for
G12B/SM1
> On 10 Feb 2022, at 5:31 am, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com> wrote:
>
> Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@...il.com> writes:
>
>> Amlogic G12B and SM1 devices experience CPU stalls and random board
>> wedges when the system idles and CPU cores clock down to lower opp
>> points. Recent vendor kernels include a change to remove 100-250MHz
>> (with no explanation) [0] but other downstream sources also remove
>> the 500/667MHz points (also with no explanation). Unless 100-667Mhz
>> opps are removed or the CPU governor forced to performance, stalls
>> are observed, so let's remove them an improve stability/uptime.
>
> Just curious: what CPUfreq governor do you use by default for the
> LibreELEC kernel?
LE uses ondemand. One of the original clues on the problem us that the
issue isn’t seen in some of the retro-gaming forks on LE's codebase
which use the performance governor (and overclocks, etc.)
> Your patch greatly improves the stability I'm seeing, but doesn't quite
> elimitate it.
>
> I'm testing suspend/resume in a loop on VIM3, and with schedutil
> (default) or ondemand, it eventually hangs. With either powersave or
> performance it's stable.
>
> Kevin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists