linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: dts: add DT for lan966 SoC and 2-port board pcb8291

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:05:24 +0100
From:   Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>
To:     Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com
Cc:     Manohar.Puri@...rochip.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, arnd@...db.de,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
        olof@...om.net, robh+dt@...nel.org, soc@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] ARM: dts: add DT for lan966 SoC and 2-port board
 pcb8291

Am 2022-02-10 12:52, schrieb Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know 
>> the
>> content is safe
>> 
>> Am 2022-02-10 10:40, schrieb Kavyasree.Kotagiri@...rochip.com:
>> >> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know
>> >> the
>> >> content is safe
>> 
>> >> > +     clocks {
>> >> [..]
>> >> > +
>> >> > +             nic_clk: nic_clk {
>> >>
>> >> What does nic_clk stand for? If I had to guess, it
>> >> has something to do with network. But..
>> >>
>> > NIC clock is the clock used by AXI, AHB fabric and APB bridges which
>> > connects all the peripherals.
>> > It is named so because the AXI fabric is based on NIC400 IP from ARM
>> 
>> Ok, thanks for clarification.
>> 
>> 
>> >> > +             watchdog: watchdog@...90000 {
>> >> > +                     compatible = "snps,dw-wdt";
>> >> > +                     reg = <0xe0090000 0x1000>;
>> >> > +                     interrupts = <GIC_SPI 38 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
>> >> > +                     clocks = <&nic_clk>;
>> >>
>> >> Btw. can we disable all nodes by default and enable them
>> >> in the board dts files?
>> > I would like to have only board specific nodes enabled in dts files
>> > and rest of them in dtsi file
>> 
>> And how do you know which ones are board specific? E.g. I would like
>> to add our board which is also based on the lan9668. Maybe I don't
>> want a watchdog (or whatever node). Of course I could use
>> 
>> &watchdog {
>>    status = "disabled";
>> };
>> 
>> But IMHO opt-in is better. At least thats what we are doing for
>> the layerscape over on arm64.
>> 
> Basically, I am disabling only the nodes which have pinctrl settings
> in dtsi file
> and enable in dts to make sure there are no conflicts on pins on the 
> board.

Thats not what I'm asking. I would like to see *optional* nodes
disabled by default. Whether the watchdog is optional might be
debatable, but what about the usb controller and the qspi
controller? They don't have shared pins AFAIK, so according
to your rule, they will be enabled by default and each board
which doesn't have anything connected on these pins would have
to disabled it.

Please keep in mind that this .dtsi will also be used by boards
not manufactured by microchip.

-michael