[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b83e4324-6ef8-1cf0-b5e2-00d0802a6f75@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:44:34 +0800
From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@...hat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] iommu: Remove guest pasid related interfaces and
definitions
Hi Jason,
On 2/9/22 9:29 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
>> index 59178fc229ca..65d8b0234f69 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/iommu.h
>> @@ -158,185 +158,4 @@ struct iommu_page_response {
>> __u32 code;
>> };
> What is the plan for the rest of the dead code in this file?
The remaining code are IOMMU fault related. I can look into them in a
separated series where I plan to make the I/O page fault framework
generic.
Best regards,
baolu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists