[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgUNdJgC9dNJN82P@corigine.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:04:52 +0100
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
John Hurley <john.hurley@...ronome.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
oss-drivers@...igine.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfp: flower: Fix a potential theorical leak in
nfp_tunnel_add_shared_mac()
Hi Christophe,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 07:58:47PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> ida_simple_get() returns an id between min (0) and max (NFP_MAX_MAC_INDEX)
> inclusive.
> So NFP_MAX_MAC_INDEX (0xff) is a valid id
>
> In order for the error handling path to work correctly, the 'invalid'
> value for 'ida_idx' should not be in the 0..NFP_MAX_MAC_INDEX range,
> inclusive.
>
> So set it to -1.
>
> While at it, use ida_alloc_xxx()/ida_free() instead to
> ida_simple_get()/ida_simple_remove().
> The latter is deprecated and more verbose.
>
> Fixes: 20cce8865098 ("nfp: flower: enable MAC address sharing for offloadable devs")
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Thanks for your patch.
I agree that it is indeed a problem and your fix looks good.
I would, however, prefer if the patch was split into two:
1. Bug fix
2. ida_alloc_xxx()/ida_free() cleanup
Thanks again,
Simon
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists