linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: bindings: fsl-asoc-card: Add compatible for tlv320aic31xx codec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YgUTImUs470jVdYs@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:29:06 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Apertis package maintainers <packagers@...ts.apertis.org>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-imx@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com, festevam@...il.com,
        krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com, lgirdwood@...il.com,
        michael@...rulasolutions.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        s.hauer@...gutronix.de, shawnguo@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: bindings: fsl-asoc-card: Add compatible for
 tlv320aic31xx codec

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 01:24:34PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:49:45PM -0300, Apertis package maintainers wrote:
> > From: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com>
> > 
> > Commit 8c9b9cfb7724 ("ASoC: fsl-asoc-card: Support
> > fsl,imx-audio-tlv320aic31xx codec")' added support for tlv320aic31xx
> > codec to fsl-asoc-card, but missed the related device-tree compatible
> > string documentation. Fix this.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Ariel D'Alessandro <ariel.dalessandro@...labora.com>
> > ---
> 
> This has a signoff from Ariel but the mail comes from something called
> "Apertis package maintainers" and I really can't tell if there's a good
> signoff chain here, please see Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> for details on what this is and why it's important.  The submission
> really needs to come from an actual person who's providing a signoff.

...and in fact the address for this group(?) isn't even deliverable :(

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)