lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 10 Feb 2022 13:38:12 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
Cc:     alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Srinivasa Rao Mandadapu <srivasam@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: qcom: Actually clear DMA interrupt register for HDMI

On Wed, 9 Feb 2022 15:25:20 -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> In commit da0363f7bfd3 ("ASoC: qcom: Fix for DMA interrupt clear reg
> overwriting") we changed regmap_write() to regmap_update_bits() so that
> we can avoid overwriting bits that we didn't intend to modify.
> Unfortunately this change breaks the case where a register is writable
> but not readable, which is exactly how the HDMI irq clear register is
> designed (grep around LPASS_HDMITX_APP_IRQCLEAR_REG to see how it's
> write only). That's because regmap_update_bits() tries to read the
> register from the hardware and if it isn't readable it looks in the
> regmap cache to see what was written there last time to compare against
> what we want to write there. Eventually, we're unable to modify this
> register at all because the bits that we're trying to set are already
> set in the cache.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-linus

Thanks!

[1/1] ASoC: qcom: Actually clear DMA interrupt register for HDMI
      commit: c8d251f51ee61df06ee0e419348d8c9160bbfb86

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ