[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgUXcGC1mH7VX1d9@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:47:28 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org, joseph.salisbury@...onical.com,
Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/ftrace: Do not trace do_softirq because of
PREEMPT_RT
On 2022-02-10 09:33:56 [+0100], Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The PREEMPT_RT patchset does not use soft IRQs thus trying to filter for
> do_softirq fails for such kernel:
PREEMPT_RT does use soft IRQs.
> echo do_softirq
> ftracetest: 81: echo: echo: I/O error
>
> Choose some other visible function for the test.
>
…
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_set_ftrace_file.tc
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/ftrace/test.d/ftrace/func_set_ftrace_file.tc
> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ fail() { # mesg
>
> FILTER=set_ftrace_filter
> FUNC1="schedule"
> -FUNC2="do_softirq"
> +FUNC2="scheduler_tick"
What is the purpose of this?
> ALL_FUNCS="#### all functions enabled ####"
>
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists