[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d6cbfe4-ee1a-ec5f-4249-c25ab6142668@csgroup.eu>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 14:00:48 +0000
From: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To: "mcgrof@...nel.org" <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...mlin.com>
CC: "cl@...ux.com" <cl@...ux.com>,
"pmladek@...e.com" <pmladek@...e.com>,
"mbenes@...e.cz" <mbenes@...e.cz>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"jeyu@...nel.org" <jeyu@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
"live-patching@...r.kernel.org" <live-patching@...r.kernel.org>,
"atomlin@...mlin.com" <atomlin@...mlin.com>,
"ghalat@...hat.com" <ghalat@...hat.com>,
"allen.lkml@...il.com" <allen.lkml@...il.com>,
"void@...ifault.com" <void@...ifault.com>,
"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
"msuchanek@...e.de" <msuchanek@...e.de>,
"oleksandr@...alenko.name" <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/13] module: Move sysfs support into a separate file
Le 09/02/2022 à 18:11, Aaron Tomlin a écrit :
> No functional change.
>
> This patch migrates module sysfs support out of core code into
> kernel/module/sysfs.c. In addition simple code refactoring to
> make this possible.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/module/Makefile | 1 +
> kernel/module/internal.h | 24 ++
> kernel/module/main.c | 458 +--------------------------------------
> kernel/module/sysfs.c | 425 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 4 files changed, 453 insertions(+), 455 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 kernel/module/sysfs.c
Checkpatch:
total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 10 checks, 946 lines checked
>
> diff --git a/kernel/module/Makefile b/kernel/module/Makefile
> index c6be08060252..c30141c37eb3 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/Makefile
> +++ b/kernel/module/Makefile
> @@ -14,4 +14,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_STRICT_MODULE_RWX) += strict_rwx.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK) += debug_kmemleak.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_KALLSYMS) += kallsyms.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += procfs.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SYSFS) += sysfs.o
> endif
> diff --git a/kernel/module/internal.h b/kernel/module/internal.h
> index b67ce836746a..52d30bf6d6b0 100644
> --- a/kernel/module/internal.h
> +++ b/kernel/module/internal.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,9 @@
> extern struct mutex module_mutex;
> extern struct list_head modules;
>
> +extern struct module_attribute *modinfo_attrs[];
> +extern size_t modinfo_attrs_count;
Can't this come in sysfs.c as well ?
> +
> /* Provided by the linker */
> extern const struct kernel_symbol __start___ksymtab[];
> extern const struct kernel_symbol __stop___ksymtab[];
> @@ -206,3 +209,24 @@ static inline char *find_kallsyms_symbol(struct module *mod, unsigned long addr,
> return NULL;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_KALLSYMS */
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
> +int mod_sysfs_setup(struct module *mod, const struct load_info *info,
> + struct kernel_param *kparam, unsigned int num_params);
> +void mod_sysfs_fini(struct module *mod);
> +void module_remove_modinfo_attrs(struct module *mod, int end);
> +void del_usage_links(struct module *mod);
> +void init_param_lock(struct module *mod);
Why don't we move mod_sysfs_teardown() here as well ?
It looks strange to move mod_sysfs_setup() and not mod_sysfs_teardown()
> +#else /* !CONFIG_SYSFS */
> +static int mod_sysfs_setup(struct module *mod,
> + const struct load_info *info,
> + struct kernel_param *kparam,
> + unsigned int num_params)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static inline void mod_sysfs_fini(struct module *mod) { }
> +static inline void module_remove_modinfo_attrs(struct module *mod, int end) { }
> +static inline void del_usage_links(struct module *mod) { }
> +static inline void init_param_lock(struct module *mod) { }
> +#endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists