[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5449119d-29e7-0179-d865-d0cb47db367b@opensource.wdc.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 08:59:21 +0900
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>
To: Sean Anderson <seanga2@...il.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: k210: Fix bias-pull-up
On 2022/02/10 8:52, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 2/9/22 6:34 PM, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> On 2/10/22 03:28, Sean Anderson wrote:
>>> Using bias-pull-up would actually cause the pin to have its pull-down
>>> enabled. Fix this.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k210.c | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k210.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k210.c
>>> index 49e32684dbb2..1ad61b32ec88 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k210.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-k210.c
>>> @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ static int k210_pinconf_set_param(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
>>> case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
>>> if (!arg)
>>> return -EINVAL;
>>> - val |= K210_PC_PD;
>>> + val |= K210_PC_PU;
>>> break;
>>> case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH:
>>> arg *= 1000;
>>
>> Ooops... My bad :)
>
> (This is in U-Boot as well, so it looks like it's my bad)
I copy-pasted a bug, still my bad :)
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists