[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgaVCmizWJfFMK5I@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:55:38 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] dt-bindings: spi: Add compatible for Mediatek IPM IP
with single mode
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 07:19:33PM +0800, Leilk Liu wrote:
> This commit adds dt-binding documentation for
> Mediatek SPI IPM IP with single mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Leilk Liu <leilk.liu@...iatek.com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml
> index bfa44acb1bdd..0a2fc0404cb3 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/mediatek,spi-mt65xx.yaml
> @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ properties:
> - mediatek,mt8135-spi
> - mediatek,mt8173-spi
> - mediatek,mt8183-spi
> + - mediatek,ipm-spi-single
Is IPM an SoC? Compatible strings should be SoC specific or whatever
granularity could have a unique errata.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists