linux-kernel - [PATCH v4 07/10] KVM: s390: Rename existing vcpu memop functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220211182215.2730017-8-scgl@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 19:22:12 +0100
From:   Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sven Schnelle <svens@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 07/10] KVM: s390: Rename existing vcpu memop functions

Makes the naming consistent, now that we also have a vm ioctl.

Signed-off-by: Janis Schoetterl-Glausch <scgl@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index 36bc73b5f5de..773bccdd446c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -4741,8 +4741,8 @@ static int kvm_vcpu_ioctl_enable_cap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return r;
 }
 
-static long kvm_s390_guest_sida_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-				   struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop)
+static long kvm_s390_vcpu_sida_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				  struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop)
 {
 	void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)mop->buf;
 	int r = 0;
@@ -4771,8 +4771,9 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_sida_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	}
 	return r;
 }
-static long kvm_s390_guest_mem_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-				  struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop)
+
+static long kvm_s390_vcpu_mem_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				 struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop)
 {
 	void __user *uaddr = (void __user *)mop->buf;
 	void *tmpbuf = NULL;
@@ -4835,8 +4836,8 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_mem_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return r;
 }
 
-static long kvm_s390_guest_memsida_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-				      struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop)
+static long kvm_s390_vcpu_memsida_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				     struct kvm_s390_mem_op *mop)
 {
 	int r, srcu_idx;
 
@@ -4845,12 +4846,12 @@ static long kvm_s390_guest_memsida_op(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	switch (mop->op) {
 	case KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_READ:
 	case KVM_S390_MEMOP_LOGICAL_WRITE:
-		r = kvm_s390_guest_mem_op(vcpu, mop);
+		r = kvm_s390_vcpu_mem_op(vcpu, mop);
 		break;
 	case KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_READ:
 	case KVM_S390_MEMOP_SIDA_WRITE:
 		/* we are locked against sida going away by the vcpu->mutex */
-		r = kvm_s390_guest_sida_op(vcpu, mop);
+		r = kvm_s390_vcpu_sida_op(vcpu, mop);
 		break;
 	default:
 		r = -EINVAL;
@@ -5013,7 +5014,7 @@ long kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl(struct file *filp,
 		struct kvm_s390_mem_op mem_op;
 
 		if (copy_from_user(&mem_op, argp, sizeof(mem_op)) == 0)
-			r = kvm_s390_guest_memsida_op(vcpu, &mem_op);
+			r = kvm_s390_vcpu_memsida_op(vcpu, &mem_op);
 		else
 			r = -EFAULT;
 		break;
-- 
2.32.0