[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220211204433.GT785175@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:44:33 -0800
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Cc: "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
"dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 30/44] mm/pkeys: Test setting a PKS key in a custom
fault callback
On Tue, Feb 01, 2022 at 09:42:32AM -0800, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 09:54 -0800, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > +#define RUN_FAULT_ABANDON 5
>
> The tests still call this operation "abandon" all throughout, but the
> operation got renamed in the kernel. Probably should rename it in the
> tests too.
Thanks... I thought I had changed all the names. Missed that one.
s/RUN_FAULT_ABANDON/RUN_FAULT_CALLBACK
Ira
Powered by blists - more mailing lists