[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220211205026.6jhtt66wco5ht6i6@mercury.elektranox.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 21:50:26 +0100
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Qing Wang <wangqing@...o.com>
Cc: Support Opensource <support.opensource@...semi.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: supply: da9150: use div64_u64() instead of
do_div()
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 12:39:46AM -0800, Qing Wang wrote:
> From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
>
> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division.
> When the divisor is u64, do_div() truncates it to 32 bits, this means it
> can test non-zero and be truncated to zero for division.
>
> fix do_div.cocci warning:
> do_div() does a 64-by-32 division, please consider using div64_u64 instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
> ---
Thanks, queued.
-- Sebastian
> drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
> index 6e36782..896491a
> --- a/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/supply/da9150-fg.c
> @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ static int da9150_fg_current_avg(struct da9150_fg *fg,
> div = (u64) (sd_gain * shunt_val * 65536ULL);
> do_div(div, 1000000);
> res = (u64) (iavg * 1000000ULL);
> - do_div(res, div);
> + div64_u64(res, div);
>
> val->intval = (int) res;
>
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists