[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgbT4uqSIVY9ku10@rowland.harvard.edu>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:23:46 -0500
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: syzbot <syzbot+8caaaec4e7a55d75e243@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-input@...r.kernel.org, noralf@...nnes.org,
syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, tzimmermann@...e.de
Subject: Re: [syzbot] memory leak in hub_event (3)
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:17:26PM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzbot found the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: dfd42facf1e4 Linux 5.17-rc3
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=14b4ef7c700000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=48b71604a367da6e
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8caaaec4e7a55d75e243
> compiler: gcc (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=1396902c700000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=1466e662700000
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+8caaaec4e7a55d75e243@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> BUG: memory leak
> unreferenced object 0xffff88810d49e800 (size 2048):
> comm "kworker/1:1", pid 25, jiffies 4294954629 (age 16.460s)
> hex dump (first 32 bytes):
> ff ff ff ff 31 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ....1...........
> 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 ................
> backtrace:
> [<ffffffff82c87a62>] kmalloc include/linux/slab.h:581 [inline]
> [<ffffffff82c87a62>] kzalloc include/linux/slab.h:715 [inline]
> [<ffffffff82c87a62>] usb_alloc_dev+0x32/0x450 drivers/usb/core/usb.c:582
> [<ffffffff82c91a47>] hub_port_connect drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5260 [inline]
> [<ffffffff82c91a47>] hub_port_connect_change drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5502 [inline]
> [<ffffffff82c91a47>] port_event drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5660 [inline]
> [<ffffffff82c91a47>] hub_event+0x1097/0x21a0 drivers/usb/core/hub.c:5742
> [<ffffffff8126c3ef>] process_one_work+0x2bf/0x600 kernel/workqueue.c:2307
> [<ffffffff8126ccd9>] worker_thread+0x59/0x5b0 kernel/workqueue.c:2454
> [<ffffffff81276765>] kthread+0x125/0x160 kernel/kthread.c:377
> [<ffffffff810022ff>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295
There's a refcount leak in the probe-failure path of the hid-elo driver.
(You can see that this is the relevant driver in the console output.)
It doesn't need the refcount anyway, because the elo_priv structure is
always deallocated synchronously before the elo_remove routine returns.
(Syzbot isn't always all that great at deducing where the real problem
lies when something goes wrong.)
Alan Stern
#syz test: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/ v5.17-rc3
Index: usb-devel/drivers/hid/hid-elo.c
===================================================================
--- usb-devel.orig/drivers/hid/hid-elo.c
+++ usb-devel/drivers/hid/hid-elo.c
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static int elo_probe(struct hid_device *
INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&priv->work, elo_work);
udev = interface_to_usbdev(to_usb_interface(hdev->dev.parent));
- priv->usbdev = usb_get_dev(udev);
+ priv->usbdev = udev;
hid_set_drvdata(hdev, priv);
@@ -270,8 +270,6 @@ static void elo_remove(struct hid_device
{
struct elo_priv *priv = hid_get_drvdata(hdev);
- usb_put_dev(priv->usbdev);
-
hid_hw_stop(hdev);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&priv->work);
kfree(priv);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists