[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220211021324.4116773-5-ebiederm@xmission.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 20:13:21 -0600
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>,
Ran Xiaokai <ran.xiaokai@....com.cn>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] ucounts: Handle wrapping in is_ucounts_overlimit
While examining is_ucounts_overlimit and reading the various messages
I realized that is_ucounts_overlimit fails to deal with counts that
may have wrapped.
Being wrapped should be a transitory state for counts and they should
never be wrapped for long, but it can happen so handle it.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Fixes: 21d1c5e386bc ("Reimplement RLIMIT_NPROC on top of ucounts")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
kernel/ucount.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/ucount.c b/kernel/ucount.c
index 65b597431c86..06ea04d44685 100644
--- a/kernel/ucount.c
+++ b/kernel/ucount.c
@@ -350,7 +350,8 @@ bool is_ucounts_overlimit(struct ucounts *ucounts, enum ucount_type type, unsign
if (rlimit > LONG_MAX)
max = LONG_MAX;
for (iter = ucounts; iter; iter = iter->ns->ucounts) {
- if (get_ucounts_value(iter, type) > max)
+ long val = get_ucounts_value(iter, type);
+ if (val < 0 || val > max)
return true;
max = READ_ONCE(iter->ns->ucount_max[type]);
}
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists