[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220211043057.t6ukpdtakcht3frc@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 10:00:57 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@...il.dk>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>,
Alexey Klimov <aklimov@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/49] cpufreq: replace cpumask_weight with cpumask_empty
where appropriate
On 10-02-22, 14:49, Yury Norov wrote:
> drivers/cpufreq calls cpumask_weight() to check if any bit of a given
> cpumask is set. We can do it more efficiently with cpumask_empty() because
> cpumask_empty() stops traversing the cpumask as soon as it finds first set
> bit, while cpumask_weight() counts all bits unconditionally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com> (for SCMI cpufreq driver)
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 2 +-
> drivers/cpufreq/scmi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
I already applied it yesterday and replied to you as well. Did I miss
something ?
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists