[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220211064917.2028469-2-shakeelb@google.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 22:49:14 -0800
From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
Cc: Chris Down <chris@...isdown.name>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] memcg: refactor mem_cgroup_oom
The function mem_cgroup_oom returns enum which has four possible values
but the caller does not care about such values and only cares if the
return value is OOM_SUCCESS or not. So, remove the enum altogether and
make mem_cgroup_oom returns a simple bool.
Signed-off-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Added comment for mem_cgroup_oom as suggested by Roman
mm/memcontrol.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index a0e9d9f12cf5..f12e489ba9b8 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -1795,20 +1795,16 @@ static void memcg_oom_recover(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
__wake_up(&memcg_oom_waitq, TASK_NORMAL, 0, memcg);
}
-enum oom_status {
- OOM_SUCCESS,
- OOM_FAILED,
- OOM_ASYNC,
- OOM_SKIPPED
-};
-
-static enum oom_status mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order)
+/*
+ * Returns true if successfully killed one or more processes. Though in some
+ * corner cases it can return true even without killing any process.
+ */
+static bool mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int order)
{
- enum oom_status ret;
- bool locked;
+ bool locked, ret;
if (order > PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER)
- return OOM_SKIPPED;
+ return false;
memcg_memory_event(memcg, MEMCG_OOM);
@@ -1831,14 +1827,13 @@ static enum oom_status mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int
* victim and then we have to bail out from the charge path.
*/
if (memcg->oom_kill_disable) {
- if (!current->in_user_fault)
- return OOM_SKIPPED;
- css_get(&memcg->css);
- current->memcg_in_oom = memcg;
- current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask = mask;
- current->memcg_oom_order = order;
-
- return OOM_ASYNC;
+ if (current->in_user_fault) {
+ css_get(&memcg->css);
+ current->memcg_in_oom = memcg;
+ current->memcg_oom_gfp_mask = mask;
+ current->memcg_oom_order = order;
+ }
+ return false;
}
mem_cgroup_mark_under_oom(memcg);
@@ -1849,10 +1844,7 @@ static enum oom_status mem_cgroup_oom(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t mask, int
mem_cgroup_oom_notify(memcg);
mem_cgroup_unmark_under_oom(memcg);
- if (mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, mask, order))
- ret = OOM_SUCCESS;
- else
- ret = OOM_FAILED;
+ ret = mem_cgroup_out_of_memory(memcg, mask, order);
if (locked)
mem_cgroup_oom_unlock(memcg);
@@ -2545,7 +2537,6 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
int nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
struct mem_cgroup *mem_over_limit;
struct page_counter *counter;
- enum oom_status oom_status;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed;
bool passed_oom = false;
bool may_swap = true;
@@ -2648,9 +2639,8 @@ static int try_charge_memcg(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, gfp_t gfp_mask,
* a forward progress or bypass the charge if the oom killer
* couldn't make any progress.
*/
- oom_status = mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
- get_order(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE));
- if (oom_status == OOM_SUCCESS) {
+ if (mem_cgroup_oom(mem_over_limit, gfp_mask,
+ get_order(nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE))) {
passed_oom = true;
nr_retries = MAX_RECLAIM_RETRIES;
goto retry;
--
2.35.1.265.g69c8d7142f-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists