lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 00:27:33 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, mlevitsk@...hat.com, dmatlack@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/12] KVM: MMU: rename kvm_mmu_reload

On Wed, Feb 09, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The name of kvm_mmu_reload is very confusing for two reasons:
> first, KVM_REQ_MMU_RELOAD actually does not call it; second,
> it only does anything if there is no valid root.
> 
> Rename it to kvm_mmu_ensure_valid_root, which matches the actual
> behavior better.

100% agree that kvm_mmu_reload() is a terrible name, but kvm_mmu_ensure_valid_root()
isn't much better, e.g. it sounds like a sanity check and nothing more.

Maybe just be very literalal?

  kvm_mmu_load_if_necessary()
  kvm_mmu_load_if_invalid()

Or follow cond_sched()?

  kvm_mmu_cond_load()

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ