lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <356a4b9a-1f56-ae06-b211-bd32fc93ecda@redhat.com>
Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:43:46 +0100
From:   David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@...ux.dev>,
        Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] mm: enable MADV_DONTNEED for hugetlb mappings

>>>
>>> I am now rethinking the decision to proceed with b) as described above.
>>>
>>> With the exception of MADV_REMOVE (which we may be able to change for
>>> hugetlb),  madvise operations operate on huge page size pages for hugetlb
>>> mappings.  If start address is in the middle of a hugetlb page, we essentially
>>> align down to the beginning of the hugetlb page.  If length lands in the
>>> middle of a hugetlb page, we essentially round up.
>>
>> Which MADV calls would be affected?
> 
> Not sure I understand the question.  I was saying that madvise calls which
> operate on hugetlb mappings today only operate on huge pages.  So, this is
> essentially align down starting address and align up end address.

Let me clarify:

If you accidentially
MADV_NORMAL/MADV_RANDOM/MADV_SEQUENTIAL/MADV_WILLNEED a range that's
slightly bigger/smaller than the requested one you don't actually care,
because it will only slightly affect the performance of an application,
if at all.  MADV_COLD/MADV_PAGEOUT should be similar. I assume these
don't apply to hugetlb at all.

The effects of
MADV_MERGEABLE/MADV_UNMERGEABLE/MADV_HUGEPAGE/MADV_NOHUGEPAGE should in
theory be similar, however, there can be some user-space visible effects
when you get it wrong. I assume these don't apply to hugetlb at all.

However, for
MADV_DONTNEED/MADV_REMOVE/MADV_DONTFORK/MADV_DOFORK/MADV_FREE/MADV_WIPEONFORK/MADV_KEEPONFORK/MADV_DONTDUMP/MADV_DODUMP/....
the application could easily detect the difference of the actual range
handling.


> For example consider the MADV_POPULATE calls you recently added.  They will
> only fault in huge pages in a hugetlb vma.

On a related note: I don't see my man page updates upstream yet. And the
last update upstream seems to have happened 5 months ago ... not sure
why the man project seems to have stalled.

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/docs/man-pages/man-pages.git/

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ