[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YgY89RxkAl12n/dd@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 18:39:49 +0800
From: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
To: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@...edance.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Chen Zhou <dingguo.cz@...group.com>,
John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@...cle.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 2/5] arm64: kdump: introduce some macros for crash
kernel reservation
On 01/24/22 at 04:47pm, Zhen Lei wrote:
> From: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
>
> Introduce macro CRASH_ALIGN for alignment, macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX
> for upper bound of low crash memory, macro CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX for
> upper bound of high crash memory, use macros instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>
> Tested-by: John Donnelly <John.p.donnelly@...cle.com>
> Tested-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 11 ++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 90f276d46b93bc6..6c653a2c7cff052 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -65,6 +65,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(memstart_addr);
> phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC_CORE
> +/* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
> +#define CRASH_ALIGN SZ_2M
> +
> +#define CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX arm64_dma_phys_limit
> +#define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE is obvoiously a alloc flag for memblock
allocator, I don't think it's appropriate to make HIGH_MAX get its value.
You can make it as memblock.current_limit, or do not define it, but using
MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE direclty in memblock_phys_alloc_range() with
a code comment.
> +
> /*
> * reserve_crashkernel() - reserves memory for crash kernel
> *
> @@ -75,7 +81,7 @@ phys_addr_t arm64_dma_phys_limit __ro_after_init;
> static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> {
> unsigned long long crash_base, crash_size;
> - unsigned long long crash_max = arm64_dma_phys_limit;
> + unsigned long long crash_max = CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX;
> int ret;
>
> ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, memblock_phys_mem_size(),
> @@ -90,8 +96,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> if (crash_base)
> crash_max = crash_base + crash_size;
>
> - /* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
> - crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, SZ_2M,
> + crash_base = memblock_phys_alloc_range(crash_size, CRASH_ALIGN,
> crash_base, crash_max);
> if (!crash_base) {
> pr_warn("cannot allocate crashkernel (size:0x%llx)\n",
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists