linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 02/11] iio: afe: rescale: add INT_PLUS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8a8980e1-97a4-1061-db76-8592b1f21111@axentia.se>
Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:20:39 +0100
From:   Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>
To:     Liam Beguin <liambeguin@...il.com>
Cc:     jic23@...nel.org, andy.shevchenko@...il.com, lars@...afoo.de,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 02/11] iio: afe: rescale: add INT_PLUS_{MICRO,NANO}
 support

On 2022-02-10 18:36, Liam Beguin wrote:
> I like that the macros make the number of zeros more "obvious" in a
> sense, but honestly at this point, I'd rather go back to not using them.
> Depending on who you ask, one way makes more sense than the other, at
> least with the raw values, there's no ambiguity.

I'm fine with not using the macros in this series, obviously. While I
can tolerate them, I do not get a warm and cozy feeling when I see
them.

Cheers,
Peter