linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: cs-etm: No-op refactor of synth opt usage

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 23:20:26 +0800
From:   Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To:     James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc:     acme@...nel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
        mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf: cs-etm: No-op refactor of synth opt usage

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 08:06:19PM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> sample_branches and sample_instructions are already saved in the
> synth_opts struct. Other usages like synth_opts.last_branch don't save
> a value, so make this more consistent by always going through synth_opts
> and not saving duplicate values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>

The patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>