linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: usi: refer to dtschema for children

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 11 Feb 2022 17:46:05 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: usi: refer to dtschema for
 children

On 11/02/2022 17:04, Sam Protsenko wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 at 21:41, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
>>
>> Explicitly reference the dtschema for USI children implementing specific
>> serial protocol (I2C, SPI, UART).  The SPI schema is not yet accepted,
>> so it will be provided later.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/soc/samsung/exynos-usi.yaml      | 19 +++++++++++--------
>>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/exynos-usi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/exynos-usi.yaml
>> index 58f2e9d8bb0e..f3aae7e0e2e6 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/exynos-usi.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/samsung/exynos-usi.yaml
>> @@ -18,11 +18,7 @@ description: |
>>    selects which particular function will be used.
>>
>>    Refer to next bindings documentation for information on protocol subnodes that
>> -  can exist under USI node:
> 
> This whole paragraph doesn't make much sense now, because the doc
> links it refers to are removed in this patch. Maybe it's better to
> just remove the whole paragraph?

Yes, I will drop it.


Best regards,
Krzysztof