[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220212112403.GA20866@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 12:24:03 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] dt-bindings: leds: common: fix unit address in
max77693 example
Hi!
> > The max77693 LED device node should not take an unit address, because it
> > is instantiated from a max77693 I2C parent device node. This also
> > splits all examples to separate DTS examples because they are actually
> > independent.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/common.yaml | 9 +++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
>
> This should be part of my max77693 patchset:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220111175017.223966-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com/
>
> Nothing actually depends on this patch. It just fixes a warning which
> will be brought to eyes with mentioned max77693 patchset.
>
> Pavel, feel free to take it separately via leds tree. Other way is to
> take it with other max77693 patches (probably via MFD tree).
Ok, let me take it separately. Applied, thanks.
Best regards,
Pavel
--
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists