[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4eeab037-502c-4d8d-84da-e29203dad6ad@www.fastmail.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:07:51 -0800
From: "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...nel.org>
To: "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"Rick P Edgecombe" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
"Linux API" <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>,
"Balbir Singh" <bsingharora@...il.com>,
"Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
"Cyrill Gorcunov" <gorcunov@...il.com>,
"Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Eugene Syromiatnikov" <esyr@...hat.com>,
"Florian Weimer" <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, "Jann Horn" <jannh@...gle.com>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
"Kees Cook" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"Mike Kravetz" <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
"Nadav Amit" <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
"Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@...hat.com>, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@....cz>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
"Dave Martin" <Dave.Martin@....com>,
"Weijiang Yang" <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Moreira, Joao" <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
"john.allen@....com" <john.allen@....com>,
"kcc@...gle.com" <kcc@...gle.com>,
"Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: "Yu-cheng Yu" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/35] x86/cet/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack support
On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, at 3:37 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 1/30/22 13:18, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
>> Add the user shadow stack MSRs to the xsave helpers, so they can be used
>> to implement the functionality.
>
> Do these MSRs ever affect kernel-mode operation?
>
> If so, we might need to switch them more aggressively at context-switch
> time like PKRU.
>
> If not, they can continue to be context-switched with the PASID state
> which does not affect kernel-mode operation.
PASID? PASID is all kinds of weird. I assume you mean switching it with all the normal state.
>
> Either way, it would be nice to have some changelog material to that effect.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists