[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALMp9eRX3nTLs4gcy3wnSUSOPO7xzDpMvDLGauue9o0PwBAmbA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2022 15:32:34 -0800
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
David Dunn <daviddunn@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm/queue v2 2/3] perf: x86/core: Add interface to query
perfmon_event_map[] directly
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 10:57 AM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
> Does SGX cause problem for these people? It can create some of the same
> collection gaps:
>
> performance monitoring activities are suppressed when entering
> an opt-out (of performance monitoring) enclave.
There's our precedent!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists