[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bbcf2cf9-e039-0fba-457c-40455b8acf65@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 16:11:03 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
"Moreira, Joao" <joao.moreira@...el.com>,
"john.allen@....com" <john.allen@....com>,
"kcc@...gle.com" <kcc@...gle.com>,
"Eranian, Stephane" <eranian@...gle.com>
Cc: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/35] x86/cet/shstk: Add user-mode shadow stack support
On 2/11/22 16:07, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022, at 3:37 PM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>> On 1/30/22 13:18, Rick Edgecombe wrote:
>>> Add the user shadow stack MSRs to the xsave helpers, so they can be used
>>> to implement the functionality.
>> Do these MSRs ever affect kernel-mode operation?
>>
>> If so, we might need to switch them more aggressively at context-switch
>> time like PKRU.
>>
>> If not, they can continue to be context-switched with the PASID state
>> which does not affect kernel-mode operation.
> PASID? PASID is all kinds of weird. I assume you mean switching it
> with all the normal state.
I was grouping PASID along with the CET MSRs because they're the only
supervisor state. But, yeah, it's all XRSTOR'd at the same spot right
now, user or kernel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists